↓ Skip to main content

ProQuest

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS Medicine, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
53579 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27361 Mendeley
citeulike
16 CiteULike
You are seeing a limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Title
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Published in
PLOS Medicine, July 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Moher, Alessandro Liberati, Jennifer Tetzlaff, Douglas G. Altman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27,361 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 50 <1%
United States 44 <1%
Brazil 29 <1%
Germany 22 <1%
Australia 17 <1%
Spain 14 <1%
Portugal 14 <1%
Netherlands 12 <1%
Canada 10 <1%
Other 99 <1%
Unknown 27050 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4363 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3283 12%
Student > Bachelor 3082 11%
Researcher 2529 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1669 6%
Other 4501 16%
Unknown 7934 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5593 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 2394 9%
Psychology 1677 6%
Social Sciences 1198 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 960 4%
Other 6267 23%
Unknown 9272 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 336. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#99,648
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from PLOS Medicine
#250
of 5,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206
of 127,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS Medicine
#2
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 76.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.